Quote from: definiteidea on May 20, 2015, 06:58:52 AM

Quote from: XinXan on May 20, 2015, 06:50:20 AM

Quote from: Altcoin4life on May 20, 2015, 06:43:15 AM

Quote from: Slark on May 20, 2015, 06:34:07 AM

Quote from: Altcoin4life on May 19, 2015, 03:10:35 PM

Sig campaigns are overrated, people mostly want them as a source of income and post count boosting. Don't believe the hype

It is true that people are trying to earn from it. But is that a bad thing to do? After all signatures are serving their purpose and advertisement is visible for everyone on bitcointalk.
I still think that this is the best option to advertise here, Op can also purchase official bitcointalk banners but I think signature campaigns ads are still more noticeable.

The problem is not making money, the issue is all the random posts and spam these campaigns generate. Plus they are getting to the point where people don't care about the business they represent they only care about where the next sig campaign is. Look at every casino thread within the first 3 pages you can see people asking for it, not even trying the site.... This is where it gets to be an issue. These places don't grow and the industry won't improve and flourish if everyone looks at casinos like charities.

As i said previously in this post, if you want people not to post stupid shit you should online "hire" full members or higher for example to avoid new accounts that only want to spam and get paid. Or you can also make that every participant has to be x amount on your site to be eligible like luckybit or whatever their name is do

Interesting point guys. The sig campaign could be from full members and above...

Additional advice if you have plans on running a sig campaign, dont run a campaign if you cant run it for long and dont have much budget about it. If you close the campaign in just a short period of time it will only make your site not trustworthy and may not even attaract players