Quote from: dadice on May 20, 2015, 05:08:50 PM

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 05:07:00 PM

Quote from: dadice on May 20, 2015, 05:04:05 PM

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 04:55:43 PM

No hate at all. Just a 100% valid concern, they are the only dice site w/ investments and w/o public cold address.

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 11:10:24 AM

Quote from: dadice on May 20, 2015, 11:00:14 AM

I consider the whole story as a public attack.

LOL.

Your own site says:

Quote

Do you have proof of solvency?

90% of the coins are held in one cold storage address which will be displayed to our members, thereby allowing for full transparency to all of DaDice members.

And then when I start asking about the actual cold storage address, which is not an attack at all - a completely valid request, you come up with several bad excuses:

- Need more investments first. WRONG.
- Other sites also don't have it. WRONG.
- It's impossible because of kelly investments. WRONG.
- This investor is asking to not show it. WRONG.
- We show solvency by private cold addresses. WRONG.

I have given a lot of valid arguments and proof for each bad excuse.

And now the conclusion is "I consider the whole story as a public attack". Lol.

Well... situation seems pretty obvious to me...

They claim that it is because of the "largest investor". Note that DaDice still haven't replied to this:

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 11:43:37 AM

1.

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 10:08:25 AM

Your "largest investor" excuse is a complete joke. First of all by just putting 90% of the funds in 1 address, you are not necessarily giving out information of this investor. Secondly, since you claim to still own more than 90% of the funds, you can simply move only your own funds to 1 cold address and this "big investor" is not even included(!!)

5. Getting privacy for this situation is dead easy and cheap. Just deposit and withdraw from a known bitcoin exchange. Costs the investor 0.0002 BTC and few minutes of time.

The only reason why DaDice doesn't show their 500 bitcoins (that they claim to have -themselves- not from investors!), is because they do not have it. "Largest investor" has nothing to do with it, because they can just show their OWN funds only, still they won't.

Well, why should we? Others much larger than us refuse this all the time as well.....

Uhm no....

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 01:54:16 AM

Which gambling site with investor option claims to have 540+ bitcoins without public cold address?

blablabla

Enough said from our side. Go on if you like !

Quote from: dadice on May 20, 2015, 05:08:05 PM

Quote from: NLNico on May 20, 2015, 05:03:56 PM

Why are they unable to do this simple thing that all dice sites do?

We don't do it because you and others are pushing us around from day one. We run our business our way, if you don't like it please don't bother. But you are welcome to warn others! Always good to have critics.

Quoted for reference.