Quote from: wannesd on May 29, 2015, 09:29:04 AM

Quote from: cryptodevil on May 29, 2015, 06:11:16 AM

Quote from: wannesd on May 28, 2015, 02:51:30 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on May 28, 2015, 02:07:08 PM

Oh, ok, you were just lying then in order to better promote your false contention that I am somehow unstable and prone to emotional outbursts, which would serve to hopefully reduce the impact of the valid points I am making, right?

I tend to only roll out the condescension for when people are being forcefully ignorant, which happens a lot in this thread. It is populated by sock-puppet shills AND fan-boys who desperately refuse to consider that there never has been any evidence this scheme is anything but a long-running ponzi fraud.

But, sure, if tone-complaint is all you have then I guess it's all you've got. It doesn't really serve your case very well, though, so I'd recommend saving it for people who can't see it for the huge clunker of a fallacy it is.

There there, don't get all worked up.
I'm sure some people are very impressed by your cleverly chosen words, even if they are saying the same thing over and over again.

My "case" as you call it, was just pointing out that you're a condescending asshole. One which is highly intelligent, or one with a good dictionary.
But an asshole none the less. Perhaps there are better things you can do with your time...

Now, instead of all this negativity from you, laddie, let's get some positivity going!
Instead of pointing out all that's bad in each possible ponzi you see (and, yes, we know your intentions are honorable),
kindly point everyone here in the direction of a good, honest investment, which yields a decent intrest per month.

I'm always on the lookout for investments, and I'm done with scrypt for the time being.

Just like you couldn't actually cite where I could be accused of having 'screamed' the word 'ad-hominem', you continue to dishonestly represent the tone of my replies by accusing me of being 'worked up' when the content of my post clearly was anything but representative of somebody who was emotionally 'worked up'.

So, apart from calling me an asshole and lying about my emotional state, along with condescendingly calling me 'laddie', do you actually have anything of substance to rebut the reasonable points I've posted about the scrypt.cc scam and the fact that, as fan-boy already inadvertently pointed out, there is no benefit from a 'cloud mining' operation which has sold all of the hash power already getting new customers, which then raises the question of why they have 'referral bonuses' to get new customers when the need for new customers is exactly what you'd expect from a Ponzi-based scam.

As for asking about investment advice, no.

Well, once again, you need to calm down.
I don't mean to sound alarming, but you should see a doctor about your anger issues...

Now, let's work on your "title" of grammar police: your second paragraph is one gigantic sentence.
Please learn how to break long, pointless ramblings like that up into smaller sentences.
Also; that idiotic sentence begins as a question, yet ends as a statement. Were you looking for an answer?

Thirdly: you sir (and I use that term veeerrrryyy loosely here), are the perfect example of a coward without a single grain of originality.
You keep screaming the same arguments over and over again, covered in a layer of finely crafted words, cleverly chosen to give you an air of superiority.
You have neither the guts, nor the brains (we'll leave the cash out of this) to take a risk with money at all, yet truly believe it is your mission to save the rest of the world from themselves.

Ask yourself this: have you ever made ONE constructive remark? Ever? (and no, I don't have the time, nor the intrest, to go read all your posts).

So: you hate scrypt.cc, and likely every hyip/ponzi/scam, whatever you wanna call it.
Yet, when given the chance to actually HELP people here, and show them a better, safer alternative, your answer is "no".

You are nothing but a condescending asshole, a coward, and you've been exposed for the bag of wind that you are.

Hi wannesd, thank you for writing what I have also been thinking. Finally someone on the same page.