Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 31, 2015, 07:25:23 AM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on May 31, 2015, 07:22:30 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 31, 2015, 07:03:40 AM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on May 31, 2015, 06:46:20 AM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on May 31, 2015, 06:17:02 AM

-snip-
...who is TheGr33k?

Welp, just checked and it's some Full Member who has a positive trust score because of someone escrowing a deal for him and Vod giving him a 0.001 BTC loan...oh dear.

Jesus Christ I would escrow the damn thing just so no-one gets scammed, no offense to TheGr33k but when did Full Members start escrowing signature campaigns like this Undecided

Hopefully TC escrows it.

I don't endorse this at all but I don't want to see people scammed in all fairness.

No, please. I don't want anybody to escrow this campaign especially highly trusted members like TC. It will only increase effectiveness of the scam.

Got it the first time you said it no need for a 3rd time Tongue

(PM + 2 posts)

I'm quite aware and to be honest I don't want to (and now that I've badmouthed it I doubt they'd be happy to anyway). Problem is usually it's better to have an escrow than no escrow...because people are gullible and the signature campaign pays EXTREMELY well (I have a 600 post/month deal about to start that doesn't pay that well lol) and obviously people are greedy, the signature campaign is likely to fill up anyway so it doesn't matter if someone escrows.

I would like to see TC escrow it just because I don't think it'll make a difference to the amount of people who sign up, but yeah I don't think TheGr33k should escrow due to his very short trust history.

You are right in that. I can escrow this if you that is the right thing to do. OP is willing to send me funds if I confirm.

Better than nothing, sure. Doesn't really matter who escrows it s'long as it's someone trusted. TC would be my first choice but if he can't do it, there's you, me, etc. *shrug*

FYI, TC declined to escrow it. I received a PM from TC few minutes ago.