Quote from: sickpig on June 02, 2015, 08:46:55 AM

Quote from: Adrian-x on June 02, 2015, 02:31:39 AM

I singled out the first posts by 2 core Devs. to get a taste for there personality in the wild - early days when everyone was working nicely. (note if you read it, many other devs. are quite encouraging.)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=122013.msg1331489#msg1331489
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=122013.msg1389749#msg1389749

Sorry need to quote the first one explicitly:

Quote from: gmaxwell on December 10, 2012, 07:43:37 AM

Quote from: grau on December 10, 2012, 05:39:46 AM

All rules I found are enforced. I am eager to learn any outstanding.
The biggest deliverable is serious testing.
I would love to get this production ready this year, but since I only work on this on my spare time and my family has other plans with me around Christmas, I can not commit.

Okay. You're missing at least one important rule, but I don't know what else is missing that I missed in review.

Unless you object, I'm contemplating keeping this missing rule to myself for now so that it can function as a test of the testing. E.g. if the test don't find it, they're incomplete. Obviously I don't want to withhold information which could undermine the network, but absent better testing the software shouldn't be in production use anyways... and there are scarcely few good ways of testing the tests. Does this sound reasonable to you?

My english vocabulary is not wide enough to define how presumptuous gmaxwell's reply was. Thanks for the pointer Adrian, very informative.

Greg's post is myopic, self-serving, not pragmatic, and too idealistic.