Quote from: LazerPanther on November 27, 2014, 01:21:01 AM

Quote from: kryptologist on November 27, 2014, 12:48:28 AM

Quote from: glowshares on November 27, 2014, 12:43:12 AM

Quote from: LazerPanther on November 27, 2014, 12:25:09 AM

Quote from: kryptologist on November 27, 2014, 12:01:58 AM

Quote from: glowshares on November 26, 2014, 11:18:55 PM

Quote from: kryptologist on November 26, 2014, 10:36:05 PM

Quote from: LazerPanther on November 26, 2014, 10:08:33 PM

Quote from: whisper on November 26, 2014, 07:31:50 PM

where u see "premined" Huh

this is ico or u are a some kid around?

Haha, exactly. He doesn't understand that the number of coins on the blockchain is the amount sold during the ICO.
Staking coins does not produce produce rewards until a certain block either.

As soon as he mentioned that other Proof of Developer site, immediate RED FLAG showing that he's a troll. That garbage site is a giant wall of FAIL for every coin on there.

Let's get back on track guys. GlowShares still has not dropped below ICO price even with the first round of traders taking profits. Looking GOOOOOOD!

I'm not sure what you guys are talking about? My understanding is this was a 100% premined ICO coin. I have not been following since the beginning, please correct me if that is wrong.

Quote from: LazerPanther on November 26, 2014, 10:08:33 PM

Quote from: whisper on November 26, 2014, 07:31:50 PM

where u see "premined" Huh

this is ico or u are a some kid around?

Haha, exactly. He doesn't understand that the number of coins on the blockchain is the amount sold during the ICO.
Staking coins does not produce produce rewards until a certain block either.

As soon as he mentioned that other Proof of Developer site, immediate RED FLAG showing that he's a troll. That garbage site is a giant wall of FAIL for every coin on there.

Let's get back on track guys. GlowShares still has not dropped below ICO price even with the first round of traders taking profits. Looking GOOOOOOD!

Correct, he is just trying to plug his website. Unfortunately for him, he can plug it a thousand times and still no one will care about it.

Can we agree Glowshares dev is anonymous to the public? Because that's a fact..

KRYPTOLOGIST, WHAT IS YOUR REAL NAME, DOB, SSN, DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER, HOME ADDRESS, FIRST PET, MOTHERS MAIDEN NAME, AND CREDIT CARD NUMBER??? If you do not post all of the previous information right here in this thread, YOU ARE A DIRTY ANON TROLL

If by "dirty anon troll" you mean hypocrite, I agree. Although he is actually more anon than I am at least CryptoAsian has my identity where as "kryptologist" is completely anonymous AND the website he is trying to plug is registered privately as well: https://who.is/whois/https://alt.report

According to their very own website, "there is no in-between, just PASS or FAIL"

Yet I'm the bad guy for providing a smooth ICO that 3x almost immediately and never dropped below ICO price.

I am anonymous because no one cares who I am. No one is investing in me. That is not my website by the way, I just support their cause.

No one said you're a bad guy but anonymous ICOs are questionable. You are anonymous to the public. For some reason people in here are arguing about that. I don't get it, no reason to argue about if you're anonymous to the public or not. It's fact not opinion. It's everyone's own choice to decide if that's a good or bad thing.

I'll just leave this here...

Okay so I was right all along. An anonymous scammer dev from the beginning. Good thing the dev did a PoD right? ROFL

Sad place this crypto scene