Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on June 03, 2015, 05:00:18 PM

once again I am posting my own statement from earlier. Allow me to reiterate a key point from above: If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

What the fuck are you thinking? These people have any reasoning? rational thoughts? This is a bunch of evnious FUD-trolls. All of them trolls and their puppies either run a DICE site or public/private investor of some dice site. Just look at logic of "dooglus":

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 04:44:03 PM

Quote from: dooglus on June 03, 2015, 04:27:44 PM

I didn't say you were a Ponzi scheme. I said that your "so far we are still allowing withdrawals" argument is typical of Ponzi schemes.
I know what a Ponzi scheme is, thanks.

Quote from: dooglus on May 21, 2015, 05:14:20 PM

I guess so. But at what point? I'm horrible at predicting the future. I thought dicebitco.in and dice.ninja were the good guys, and that PRC wouldn't last 6 months. I was wrong in all 3 cases...

Quote from: dooglus on May 21, 2015, 04:04:42 PM

Proof of solvency proves solvency. It's in the name. It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness. It simply proves that they still have the coins they were entrusted with. Isn't that worth proving? Isn't it alarming if someone who you trusted to look after coins for you refuses to show you that they still have them and makes up weak excuses about why they can't?

How dooglus rolls:

1. "hey! I am not saying they are not trustworty!!"
2. "hey! I am not saying they are a ponzi!!!"
3. "hey! I am not saying they would scam!!!"
4. "hey! I am always wrong at predicting future but I wouldn't give it up, why should I?"
5. "hey! I don't think they will run away with funds but they still could??"

..."I will still leave a negative trust here, eventhough I don't think they are not trustworthy"

http://i.imgur.com/9BvvhNK.png