1) So now it's rational to carry a nuke into a city to get back at a robber, not caring about others that could be hurt?
Why do you keep trying to put words into my mouth? You brought up irrationality. Not me. I just called it a terroristic act.
2) Why does it appear that I'm prepared to commit an act of aggression? Please explain that. There's no objective threat there. You might "feel" threatened, but that doesn't matter one whit. Right? If there isn't an objective threat there's no need to pull your gun. Or is there a subjective threat here somewhere? One that you're responding to?
Because you are pulling your gun out and removing the safety. Unless we're at a gun range, that indicates you might soon shoot someone. Don't be surprised if people around you act on that indication.
3) So there is a threat? Why else would you prepare yourself? You do not prepare yourself for non-threats do you? It would be fun if you did though. "Ahh, a kitten in a blanket, I must draw my weapon and prepare to defend myself from this non-threat!"
Silly man, kittens can't shoot you. But a soldier carrying his weapon like he's in a war zone can, and all too often, does.
4) That's not for you to decide how I use my property.
Not when it harms others.
And you still haven't answered what you believe the outcome will be of handing a nuke over to Al-quaeda or similar organization. Is that question really so hard to answer?
I've already told you. The largest terrorist organizations already have nukes. I don't expect much to change by a smaller one getting one.
1) You're the one claiming that one can't be successful and irrational at the same time. I say sociopaths are good examples of the contrary. The kind of people who could do just what I described. Doing something with total disregard for others. If you just do it because fuck you, then it's not terrorism. Just disregard for others.
2) What indication? Why does drawing a gun indicate an intention to shoot someone? You say the same things over and over with different words. Just admit that there's no objective threat here and that you're responding to a subjective one.
3) So there is an objective threat now, from someone with a gun that isn't pointing at you and has the safety on?
4) So you get to decide how I use my property now? Very good. I've been saying that all along. We're getting somewhere.
5) Really? You don't think that giving nukes to someone with the stated purpose of destroying a specific region, nationality or ethnicity will have any adverse effect? What do you expect them to use the WMDs for? Decoration?