Quote from: vokain on June 08, 2015, 09:53:39 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 08, 2015, 09:51:40 PM

Quote from: vokain on June 08, 2015, 09:40:50 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 08, 2015, 09:31:30 PM

Quote from: vokain on June 08, 2015, 09:27:27 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 08, 2015, 09:22:09 PM

Quote from: smooth on June 08, 2015, 09:18:11 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 08, 2015, 08:57:16 PM

Monero folk will tell you we need more anonymity. sure, i'd like more but i think Bitcoin gives enough. unless one can attach a human identity to each address in a linear sequence you can never be sure you can tie the ends to each other of say a 5 address sequence. you might infer it but you'd have to do some investigative work which police can do if suspicious. that's enough anonymity for the ordinary user not doing anything wrong.

in short, Bitcoin should be able to provide everything for everyone. that's my opinion at least.

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 08, 2015, 08:25:22 PM

that doesn't mean it won't happen though but is the reason for the extreme resistance to it's adoption from the economic majority who are currently invested in Bitcoin.

There you go. A rational individual (investor) with this set of beliefs would hedge. If you don't, there is something other than a rational decision making process going on. No refutation of this is possible. For the logic of hedging to be incorrect you would have to be 100% sure that Bitcoin is the Eternal One True and Only Coin, which you apparently are not (see above). If you had that unquestioning faith, fair enough, but since you don't, then not hedging is just a mistake.

~~to your mind.~~ that's your rationality.

i think it is such a remote possibility that i'd rather take the risk of not hedging and instead riding Bitcoin to new heights. Monero is not even worth me studying at this point. and it's on par with other altcoins that i find equally as improbable therefore i have concluded that i will be willing to pay a premium in the far future if it seems to be gaining traction; which i don't.

You're giving away your credibility.

i don't accept criticism from liars, esp ones who doxx me with intent to incite physical harm.

Why would I want harm upon anyone? Of what harm would you fear, and why?

"A monk in the jungle need not fear."

denial is great, huh? especially someone who waxes philosophical and moral. did you choose to ignore the comment TPTB_need_war made to me immediately after you doxxed me yesterday? about coming up to my town and starting a physical fight?

btw, i clicked on the LinkedIn profile smooth put up and WTF is this? i thought you said this yesterday?:

Quote from: vokain on June 07, 2015, 03:08:13 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 07, 2015, 03:04:02 PM

Obviously, I'm not allowed to talk about the case. vokain shamelessly knows this so he can freely go off.

Actually I didn't until you said you were, but it's besides the point. I've removed myself from the case as far as I could for the most part, and it no longer matters to me. Thank you for the blessing.

but yet you advertise this is in your LinkedIn profile? WTF:

Creditors' Committee Member
United States Bankruptcy Court
June 2014 Present (1 year 1 month)San Francisco Bay Area
Representing the body of unsecured creditors that HashFast Technologies, LLC. owes in neglected contracts and witnessing Karma firsthand...
http://hashfast.org/

I have an exuberant proxy. No way that case is worth any more of my time.

what is that even supposed to mean? and is that all your really have to say for yourself after what you did and what you're continuing to do as quoted above?