Quote from: Blazedout419 on June 10, 2015, 10:58:29 PM

Quote from: Snowflake on June 10, 2015, 09:21:47 PM

Quote from: Blazedout419 on June 10, 2015, 08:45:24 PM

Pretty sad people will accept pay for an obvious ponzi like that. I was half temped to start dropping negatives on those people myself, but decided against it.

You're doing the right thing, or, at least, what I'd do in your (default trust) shoes. And I'd be even more tempted Cheesy

Exactly...being in the trust network makes me think more about my ratings. Part of me says if people are dumb enough to invest they deserve what they end up with. So I think it is best I just not do anything with no proof.

Exactly this is how DefaultTrust people should judge and those who do not go by this norm, should be kicked out of Defaulttrust. DefaultTrust is to mark out proven scammers, not what they think in their imagination that might scam. In fact, using this disguise of 'they might scam' or 'scam should be stopped before it happens' people actually leave red trust to their competition and push their favor through green trust. Especially, it is ridiculous to see when some DefaultTrust people deny to leave red trust on certain profiles, which have shown the absolute same characteristics for which others were reded. Unfortunately, though DefaultTrust is moderated, when it is abused, they ward off their responsibility by saying 'trust is not moderated'.