Quote from: TPTB_need_war on June 12, 2015, 04:03:26 AM

Quote from: kazuki49 on June 12, 2015, 02:52:37 AM

Lol suuure, there is a difference between talking about the future and creating the future, guess what Monero devs are doing?

I am not disparaging Monero (and if I am successful Monero will receive a significant use case because of my efforts, assuming Monero hasn't been subsumed by a BTC side chain). Rather I am suggesting they direct their energy to leveraging BTC instead of XMR side chains. I have a specific suggestion in mind in that regard, but that suggestion will be published with my other work (however it gets published and I hope asap).

I accede to the vaporware implication. I wanted to make some points about the overall economics, then of course it is time to shut up and implement. Before we implement, we should understand well where we are headed, so we don't waste effort.

Quote from: sidhujag on June 12, 2015, 03:34:16 AM

So your design doesn't use a blockchain, strictly p2p? The Bitcoin ala BitTorrent?

No that isn't an accurate way to visualize it. But transactions don't have to be sent to the block chain. Will publish asap for peer review. Allow me a little bit of time to figure out how I can profit on my discovery while also releasing into open source and also maximizing the odds that I am not a target of retribution nor jealousy.

So I assume they are kept in a mempool as you have to relay the transactions.. How u build consensus I dunno look fwd on reading it.. But to reach 100k tps will still be tough regardless of implementation.