Quote from: ErebusBat on September 04, 2012, 10:24:27 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 04, 2012, 10:23:04 PM

Quote from: whitslack on September 04, 2012, 10:03:27 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 04, 2012, 09:56:10 PM

Holding our USD without our consent is illegal. BitFloor must start accepting and processing USD withdrawals ASAP.

Unfortunately for those of us who had significant USD balances at Bitfloor, what others are saying is correct: Roman must now cease all activity even activity that many of us would consider "the right thing to do" and seek legal counsel. Assuming everything is handled sanely in the court system (a big assumption), we might expect a refund of our USD balances in a few months either all or in part, depending on whether the balances were legally segregated and allocated, which I doubt they were.

Wrong. Presumption of ownership goes to the segregated account holders.

BitFloor will be sued successfully for holding USD without their OWNER'S consent, unless there is a clause in the TOS stating that any USD deposited into BitFloor automatically becomes part of a single pool of assets with shared liability.

If the communist scumbag Corzine supporters wish to claw back USD that never belonged to them, they are welcome to try AFTER the rightful owners get paid, not before.

I understand your frustration, but your anger will not help anything here.

Accusing me of "anger" is not the best way to rebut anything I've claimed. The ALLCAPS are for emphasis, not rageposting.

Note that not a single exclamation point was used in my post. I'll use bold next time, so as not to further confuse you. Cool