Quote from: R2D221 on June 18, 2015, 05:47:18 PM

Quote from: maltrox on June 18, 2015, 05:39:27 PM

Well, Im not tech, Im not economist, just a crypto enthusiast, but this is my point of view. I always have seen BTC like Gold, is too hard to be used as a "currency" for the mainstream operations: you have to use it in very very very little fractions, have to wait lot of time to get a confirmation...

Considering Bitcoin was designed as an electronic cash system, your point of view doesn't match what Bitcoin is actually about. Also, you don't need to wait for confirmations when buying most things online.

Quote from: maltrox on June 18, 2015, 05:39:27 PM

But Bitcoin is the mother of crytpo, it has a value accepted and has resisted a big crisis, guys. In the near future will be more alts, not only created by techs, or by some bump-and-dump guy, the biggest corporations will create them. BTC has been the reference since the beggining... And so will be for the rest of time, is the place on the crypto ecosystem.

Corporations creating altcoins seem like a publicity stunt that won't go very far. They would become some sort of coupons, but not more.

Quote from: maltrox on June 18, 2015, 05:39:27 PM

BTC XT is trying to evolve BTC to try to be what BTC will never be. The problem is that is not evolving enough. Other alts better designed for merchants use can emerge and win the market; I hope the winner won't be a private alt...

Seems like a contradiction. Is the problem that Bitcoin is not evolving, or that it is evolving?

Quote from: maltrox on June 18, 2015, 05:39:27 PM

So I think you should create and "Official altcoin", related with Bitcoin, with some inflation options, managed by the same community. That alt must be "cheap" and must has a real stable value to support a massive selling pressure. The alt would be build over a Community Central Bank.

A Community Central Bank, i.e. a central entity, something which Bitcoin has been against since the beginning.

Well, the definition of cash needs for it to the fungible and anonymous. Bitcoin is not anonymous, or not enough due the fact the ledger is public, and fungibility is at least arguable. If you knew the BTC you just recieved comes from some illegal activity, would you still take it?
With cash, you would say yes because cash is untraceable, you wouldn't even know, the problem is with Bitcoin it's traceable due the public ledger. So im not sure about "electronic cash". I think Monero meets the electronic cash definition way better. I wish Bitcoin was as anonymous, but with anonymity other problems arise..