Quote from: hedgehogcoin on June 20, 2015, 03:35:31 PM

Quote from: placebo on June 20, 2015, 03:00:12 PM

I see one big problem in the roadmap...

infact i see a few

A takeover of a existing coin is not really interesting, the only way that HEDG can benefit from it, is when they take over a coin on a major exchange like Cryptsy. The take-over coin been removed and swapped to HEDG coins. Advantage HEDG will be listed on Cryptsy, disadvantage, i don't think that cryptsy would ever allow this kind of transaction. and just taking over a coin without able to benefit from it, is something like changing owner of a dead coin.

It's not always about the benefit or the profits Placebo.
It's about the greater cause, and the revival of solid coins that got wounded just because the dev took of.

Compare it to BMW taking over MINI. It still had some enthousiasts, some lovers, but it was a dead brand. Look at it now.
Exactly the same thing we plan on doing. Giving older coins THEIR OWN value back. Not to give it a HEDGE value/brand.

We will boost up coins, revive them again, and ensure that there is a developer behind it. But the coin stays the same.

I'm not convinced that I can keep up with the big guns, but I have put my single GPU to work. I'll give HEDGE a fair shake.
You say that the boosted coins would have a developer; are you staffed well enough to ensure this? How will said devs be paid? Are we actively pursuing coins currently and who makes the choices? Do we, coin holders, have any part in those decisions?

Thank you