Quote from: TerraMaster on June 21, 2015, 03:45:44 PM

Quote from: mishax1 on June 21, 2015, 03:36:10 PM

Quote from: DreamSpace on June 21, 2015, 01:03:22 PM

Quote from: mishax1 on June 21, 2015, 11:35:43 AM

Quote from: smaragda on June 21, 2015, 11:28:29 AM

Quote from: d34g13 on June 21, 2015, 11:18:45 AM

We are currently at around 250 GH/s

Would it make a difference if we "only" had 50 GH/s ?

I would say no.

Of course it would and so does the fact that the 250 GH/s is being provided by a very small number of miners... especially considering that there are others showing interest in Sia which cannot participate.

+1

I don't mine it since I get X10 slower rates than others and my chances of getting a block is too small in solo mining, and even if there was a pool why should I mine when others get much higher hashrates?
The price would also be evaluated by the mining profitability, meaning , less miners lower hashrate lower price.. everything is connected.

+1
same for me, actually mining is in my case senseless, also i tried the new miner 1.0.2 but it's not really faster for amd cards (linux)

What new miner ? Why no one(dev) bothers to notify anyone in this thread about a new miner ?

Don't sweat it, it isn't going to produce any better than any of the old ones really Wink

and it has been mentioned in here somewhere, maybe without a lot of fan fare lol

And I thought I could mine at 900mhs with my amd .... Roll Eyes