Quote from: kingcolex on June 23, 2015, 05:16:17 PM

Quote from: manselr on June 23, 2015, 04:14:53 PM

Quote from: Erza on June 23, 2015, 03:25:05 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on June 23, 2015, 03:05:41 PM

Quote from: scarsbergholden on June 23, 2015, 02:54:48 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on June 23, 2015, 02:08:09 PM

Quote from: Alecabel on June 23, 2015, 02:00:29 PM

Quote from: quantumgravity on June 21, 2015, 03:59:41 AM

Well? Let's hear it.

Obviously Bitcoin is much better than litecoin.Because Bitcoin has big market and world wide acceptance.

A large market and acceptance doesn't mean it is better by that standard then paypal is better than Bitcoin and we all know that is just not true.

It make you wonder why bitcoin because it was the first of its class, is like pairing litecoin and feathercoin the people give its value, we could say bitcoin is a lot better organize with bigger players in the game.

Sorry I am bit confused but I am going to reply to the last part. I wouldn't say Bitcoin is more organized based off all of the drama with the blocksize but it definitely does has bigger players but does that really make it better? Does having more large companies trying to profit off a coin make it the better coin?

Yes it is true. Having more companies will make it a better coin. Larger companies bitcoin is depends on each people usage, the more usage the more

coin and the bigger is the company. I guess that is a lot of question why they are using bitcoin more than other coin. If there are no special things

about this coin compared to others it wont has a bigger player

Network effect is so damn important, people seem to not get it. The best technology isn't always the one that ends up winning, but in this case, there isn't even better technology... tell me a coin that is technologically better that companies would find worth it dumping their BTC based infrastructures and investments to jump on it.. there's none. All the geniuses of coding are in Bitcoin, or indirectly working in something related to it.

I get what you're saying and this is true we have seen it many times in the tech world but I think people are looking at it the wrong way. This isn't a betamax vs Vcr or an Hd Dvd vs Blu ray, this is a way to transfer money without a company needing to be around to make it possible. Litecoin doesn't need a ton of stores to accept it but it will have value as people like to hold it and trade it, we only see a couple coins really get any market acceptance but Litecoin at least has some.

Yup, there are always a lot of examples to this, for example with videogames. When the Gameboy came out it was awesome, but then they announced the GameGear which smashes the Gameboy technology wise, but guess what, it was a big flop and it never got even close to the Gameboy's amazing fame or "network effect."
Same for the Saturn vs the Playstation, or the Dreamcast vs Playstation 2... network effect and a powerful brand is half of the success.