Quote from: Erdogan on June 23, 2015, 06:54:47 PM

Quote from: kazuki49 on June 23, 2015, 02:22:28 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on June 23, 2015, 02:04:33 PM

Quote from: kazuki49 on June 23, 2015, 01:59:12 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on June 23, 2015, 01:19:04 PM

speaking of fallacies, what makes you think I'm a 1 MB block man?

To answer your question about who cares when 3rd world people can't get access to 1st world technology: they do. Who is this "who" that you're referring to, when you say "who cares?". What you really mean is: I'm in my little 1st world country group of people, and I don't consider these 3rd world peasants as fully fledged humans. Who cares about them? Everyone got everything solely by merit, ergo I am superior. Let me tell you, you're looking like less of a human to me.

And speaking of consensus polling, the unilateral (i.e. the perfect opposite of a consensus poll) forked client has been rejected in favor of going through the channels to consensus that already exist.

The reality is that the former XT supporters are the people who are in desperate need of a monetary despot; you can't paint unilateral forks any other way than exactly that.

Yes, its not about the 1MB forever which is insuficient for Bitcoin on the long run, its all about consensus, and how it got destroyed prior to the hardfork that removed the 21m cap, and it will happen mark my words.

totally disagree. i've followed Bitcoin and the core dev interactions for a very, very long time in Bitcoin years. Gavin's built in increases are him trying to automate out himself as much as possible from the process going forward. he wants to avoid, if possible, the contention that has arisen from this process. and don't forget he's been lobbying for this increase for 3y but never got anywhere in discussions with the Blockstream folk. so now he has introduced his first code on this matter in a BIP in Core, not XT.

he will never propose an increase to the 21M coin cap. these are two different things you're desperately trying to conflate to push ppl to Monero.

c'mon doc, as much as I would like to "push ppl to Monero" thats not what I mean, its not about Gavin, he is not even the lead core developer, that person is Wladimir J. van der Laan. And if someone can hijack Bitcoin to fork without consensus to increase blocks it will happen with the coin cap, its just a matter of time now I'm afraid.

This is obviously written by an agent of the state.

Yep, busted, in this bizarro world the G-man are behind the most anonymous and resilient e-cash ever invented and the starving (for freedom) masses are behind the biggest paradoxy financial panopticon ever shilled on the Internet.