Quote from: coins101 on June 25, 2015, 09:18:24 PM

Quote from: defunctec on June 25, 2015, 07:01:10 PM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on June 25, 2015, 02:44:09 PM

Quote from: coins101 on June 25, 2015, 11:46:52 AM

Draft V0.2 of the white paper for comments.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oXPcN_l3vHIJq0PmhsVWCvdx45ovcJ-ifxkOPEOClZw/edit

After a commenting period, we will finish off the conclusion. A technical paper might follow in due course (not sure its needed yet) on how to deploy the Bitcoin full node incentives program.

I guess that will have to wait until ServiceNode testing is started, along with a separate testnet for the Bitcoin nodes program.

If you read how the incentives could be funded, you might get as excited as I am about the viability of the program.

Comments will be much appreciated. Stonehedge is on holiday at the moment, so very little work will be done on the white paper now. It's basically done.

Draft v.03 will also see some formatting changes and a contents page. We can then, hopefully, send it out to any Bitcoin devs interested enough and willing to comment.

After that, we'll incorporate any changes before pushing out the paper and engaging the media to see what the Bitcoin community thinks.

What does Spreadcoin get out of supporting the Bitcoin network?

Good to see you around here.

Whats your opinion on the present and future direction SPR is going?

It's just as important that you answer those questions.

I'm behind the current path.

"PoBN" will be hard to implement, but i don't really see the harm in taking this direction.

If successful SPR will be responsible for 1000 new bitcoin nodes (practically off the cuff). That's got to be worth something to both bitcoin and spreadcoin networks.

I just wanted to hear "thelones" unique opinion, still waiting Roll Eyes