Quote from: BKT217 on June 26, 2015, 07:37:13 PM

Quote from: FanEagle on June 26, 2015, 06:15:06 PM

Please OP, are you being sarcastic with those 69 hands? or you wanted to refer it as sexual like BJ can appear to mean.
I've played so many hands like for days both on live dealing and software one, and I prefer the live dealing ofc but still, 69 hands is relatively extremely small to compare a % of busting or something.

I disagree, % to bust or % of dealer upcards are fixed percentages, when a game deviates from expectations to a significant extent it can signal that there is something WRONG and it can be proven in FAR fewer hands then would be believed.

For example: If I had a bag with 99 red marbles and 1 blue marble and drew the blue marble 20 times in a row you could prove something to be statstically wrong in that game in very few trials!

I may run some more tests this weekend, I don't expect much to come from it, there is no accountability in a "bitcoin" casino.

Even look at casinos such as 5Dimes(reputable casino) they ran rigged craps for 2 years before someone decided to test it.. Roll Eyes

Only takeaway from this thread is to stick to live or provably fair casinos and always change client seed Wink

How would this manifest itself in blackjack? There are no extremely high or low probabilities for getting any of the cards. Apart from a situation where the dealer get blackjack 69 times in a row, I really fail to see what could give away that it is manipulated in so few hands.