Quote from: subSTRATA on July 05, 2015, 01:35:27 AM

Quote from: grendel25 on July 05, 2015, 01:17:35 AM

Quote from: subSTRATA on July 05, 2015, 01:09:50 AM

Quote from: grendel25 on July 05, 2015, 01:00:32 AM

Quote from: subSTRATA on July 04, 2015, 04:02:00 PM

would definitely make for one hell of a story, but sorry to say, im not affiliated with these guys in any way.

subSTRATA, that's exactly what someone who is affiliated with these guys would say. LOL... Here go the conspiracy theories to run rampant on this. Anyone seeing this thread has to admit... they probably never heard of or even cared to consider playing there until now. Just look at their "leader board" it's barely populated and mainly populated with folks ID'd in this thread.

dun dun duuuuhhhhnnnnnn!

It's all good man, I don't really think you're nefarious in this... But I could see how folks might be suspicious.

you could write a book with all the crazy conspiracy speculation that's probably going on right now Roll Eyes

and unfortunately i cant say i didnt expect to see see some sort of conspiracy theory pop up. at the same time, there really isnt a sure way for me to prove that im not affiliated with them, all i can really do is say im not. it was a fun few days though.

It really was fun and got me thinking about some different angles. I'm glad you handled it the way you did because it adds to the character of this community for one thing. And it's good for others to learn. Like Dooglus was saying he's had this type of issue in the forefront for a long time. At least now, players who have read this thread can get some insight into the mechanics of the places where they bet. It's not like it's some extremely locked down rubber-stamped mathematical formula that any dice site can duplicate. There's a lot more to it!

i personally think theres not much more to it than just a terrible, stubborn, arrogant, and extremely stupid programmer; in something like gambling, joter85 decided to disregard the mathematical proof, and implemented a 1-to-many relationship between the win chance and the multiplier, which should always be 1-to-1.

given a good dice script (example: PD) there should never be a way for a player to obtain +EV bets, no matter what. that aside, im actually getting some pm's asking if im the real Hufflepuff from PD, i think i have a pretty good idea of what they want Roll Eyes

Why would the real Hufflepuff be asking for a bug bounty of 1 BTC when he was able to successfully steal over 2k BTC Huh

While it is possible that you are Hufflepuff, I would seriously doubt it as this issue is much less complex then the exploit that Hufflepuff used. Overall, I think that some people are just idiots.