Quote from: godlyitems on July 09, 2015, 06:10:27 AM

Quote from: rio3232 on July 09, 2015, 06:04:59 AM

According to a report published in the Toronto Star, 70% of Indians live in villages, and they do not have access to basic utilities, and they are dependent on manual labor. On the other hand, India is one of the biggest importer of military weapons. India is also demanding a permanent seat in UN Security Council with all the power given to the permanent members. With these socioeconomic indexes, does India really deserve such a status in the wold body?

Read more

That's similar to China... If China has a seat in the SC then India should get one.

Quote from: rio3232 on July 09, 2015, 06:22:12 AM

Quote from: godlyitems on July 09, 2015, 06:10:27 AM

=snip=

What about Australia, Canada and Germany, don't they deserve permanent seat in the SC?

China, People Republic aside all UNSC members with a permanent seat got their status as the winners of WWII and founders of the UN. The PRC got her UNSC permanent seat as "successor" of the Nationalist China whose government was exiled on the Taiwan island after the communist takeover of mainland China.
I laugh loudly at all the countries - like India, Japan, Germany, Brazil, etc. - asking for a free great power status without paying the price associated with it!
The best & most sensible proposal to reform the UNSC was the one proposed by Italy in 1994. Otherwise, we are struck with the status quo and the one wishing to have a great power status with veto power must change it as usual, by winning a systemic war between old & new international powers. Anyone could see that the latter choice is worst than the former.