Quote from: tvbcof on July 11, 2015, 02:53:15 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 10, 2015, 06:16:57 PM

Quote from: tvbcof on July 10, 2015, 05:44:25 PM

From my admittedly tangential read, there is a hypothesis floated in legal circles that cypherdoc's involvement is somewhat more complex than simple shilling. ...

At least you admit repeating gossip and narrative, rather than primary sources. Tongue

...

No, it was a hypothesis. I mentioned it in several ways in a fairly compact way. If you will not entertain and explore a variety of hypotheses it is nearly certain that your view of the world will be highly contained and constrained and you'll be caught flat footed by almost everything of importance.

What a pleasant excursion into generalities and platitudes.

Does it have anything to do with the specific matter at hand, IE the fact that a 10% sales commission is not unusual, unethical, nor illegal?

I've already explained why the conspiracy theory you call a hypothesis does not comport with the actual timeline of events.

Perhaps you could address how we are supposed to find value in entertaining a theory at odds with already known facts.

Is it purely an exercise in imagination and creativity for the sake of making sure Katten gets paid, or what?

Oh, that's right, I forgot. You have some grievance with Frap.doc over other matters, but want to bash him with any weapon possibilly available, no matter how far-fetched.