I think Quickseller is too precipitated when he gives feedbacks. See for example this thread:

OP is not offering escrow anymore. I understand why hilarious left negative trust for OP, but in my opinion yours is unjustified because OP is not offering escrow at the moment(just my opinion please don't act like I'm insulting you or something)

Thank you for pointing this out to me. I went ahead and updated my rating to a neutral.

I don't think QS deserves to be either in the default trust settings list or be a mod.

Quickseller gave negative trust rating without verifying by himself if his assumptions are true, then confessed that his rating was wrong according to his own criteria and changed it to neutral. If enough buzz is created QS gives negative trust without checking by himself the facts, so some of their ratings are wrong, even if he does a good job in some situations, or if the accused person, by coincidence, really did what QS thinks he did.

Mod power is even more dangerous than trust power, because a perma banned user won't be able to return to the forum forever, while reputation can be rebuild and the neg reped user still can use the forum.

And we all know that QS is an account seller, so it is of his interest damage as much accounts he can, under any pretext. As patroller he would be able to ban and nuke all newbies, and I don't think the admins would spend time judging if a ban of a newbie user was really fair or not. Plus he would get access to some informations not available to normal users, what will probably be dangerous, because we don't know what other identities he has.

(btw, who put QS back in the level 2 trust?)