Quote from: samspaces on July 13, 2015, 08:26:25 PM

This coin will be lucky to get a market cap of 3 btc.

Quote from: midnightwish on July 13, 2015, 11:04:37 PM

Quote from: myagui on July 13, 2015, 09:48:13 PM

@midnightwish:

Looks to be that a bunch of wallets are staking without properly rewarding the masternode % of the PoS blocks.
Please look into this right away and push for an update that forcibly drops the offending/outdated clients from the network.
Otherwise, this remains a fundamental flaw in the masternode incentive. You can take most of the higher positions on the richlist as examples of this behavior (though not all of them).

On the other hand, if the coin will be 90% mined by the time you manage to get a working GPU miner released, it will probably not matter much at all that you fix the issue with masternode rewards (or anything at all). Would be good if you'd settle some deal with djm34, or any other capable miner developer for that matter. IIRC, OCMiner had said much earlier on, that it would be a 5 minute job to get a cuda version made. He's either lacking the 5 minutes, or perhaps the task was underestimated?

It's nice that you've approached this coin with a new algorithm and all, but if you keep ignoring the current flaws in distribution, there isn't much to expect ahead. One positive impulse right at hand, is awarding bounties for community contributions. I hope you can overcome these few hurdles and drive the project forward.
Best of Luck!

I made some adjustments to the seed nodes to help with keeping everyone sync'd up with the masternode list which should help keep the masternode payments consistent.

I really feel there is no flaw with the distribution but thanks for your input.

I don't think you really understood our concern:
What Myagui was saying is that some of the richest address don't give any coin to the masternode:
for instance, if I take that address: https://explorer.mdt.website/address/MjUZoPsTWvysTmv2BNs5uXjjP1ZzxzSvGN
if you look at the transactions, they all corresponds to POS blocks which divide into 2 contributions:
* 10% for you (which is huge by the way... that like 10% premine considering the short life of the POW)
* 90% for the address.

However it should be 10% for you (still huge I think)
33% for the masternode
57% for the owner.
So that wallet doesn't pay any contribution at all to the masternode
The second richest wallet, is yours which collect the 10% fee on staking (and actually did send some coins to the masternode)

3rd wallet normal
4rth richest wallet https://explorer.mdt.website/address/MXtJF4eVdWpVGfJt6vpd6CQWmgmtreR7uu
again same pattern the pos reward is devided by 2 10% for YO 90% for the wallet and nothing for the Masternode.

So it seems that the largest wellets don't pay their contribution to the Masternode. hence there is a flow in the design which after the righteousness of the distribution of the coin.

This problem needs to be address as soon as possible otherwise nobody will believe in that coin