Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 14, 2015, 06:30:09 PM

Quote from: tvbcof on July 14, 2015, 06:15:43 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 14, 2015, 06:06:30 PM

Quote from: tvbcof on July 14, 2015, 03:33:14 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 14, 2015, 10:42:39 AM

...
To make Frap.doc the poster child for BTCT scams is ludicrous, especially as the court has yet to declare his coins anything other than legally earned sales commission, and HF anything other than a victim of changing business conditions.

Your statement seems to imply syntactically that the court did declare the 3000 BTC a 'legally earned sales commission'. Got backup for that? That was not the impression I got on my one pass through the audio. My take-away was that the judge simply said that it was inappropriate for the plaintiff to attach the BTC at that time. IIRC, he specifically said that the question about what the 3000 BTC actually are could be worked out by an appropriate court at some point in the future.

Here in the Anglosphere, based on traditions dating back to the Romans, we enjoy the presumption of innocence.

No need for syntactic implication when logical implication is sufficient: Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat .

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis

The judge seemed to nullify your rather stretched 'presumption of innocence' by indicating that bankruptcy court was simply not the venue for adjudicating the question. You seem to be flailing pretty hard here and it is unbecoming of you. I don't think that you should count legal skills among your talents and would advise strongly that you seek qualified legal assistance if you find yourself in legal troubles.

"Flailing...unbecoming...unskilled...etc."

My previous response did not once focus on your person, yet you unleash a torrent of ad hom insult in yours.

Let's focus on facts, not personalities.

The judge certainly did not "nullify" anyone's presumption of innocence.

I could make hay of such a silly, unbounded leap in logic and respond in kind to your invective, but will instead choose to be the better man.

LOL you don't like it when people portray you in a bad light too huh?

He was just trying to "help you improve". Roll Eyes

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 13, 2015, 10:04:02 PM

Your actions portray you in a bad light.

I'm merely taking note of that, and trying to help you improve.