Quote from: barabbas on July 15, 2015, 06:03:23 AM

Quote from: Marcus Augustus on July 15, 2015, 05:53:33 AM

Quote from: barabbas on July 15, 2015, 05:34:17 AM

Quote from: Marcus Augustus on July 15, 2015, 04:58:51 AM

Quote from: barabbas on July 15, 2015, 04:50:40 AM

The one admonishing this dev as only crypto-toilet paper would be, is names Adressen, Gavin Andressen. Look him up...

Can you link that? I've looked through the commits for this coin. I've checked out a lot the development. All development here has been top notch. It looks to have had some ICOs, and maybe the funds were not carefully handled. That happens in all ventures. But the business dealings of the developers are of no concern to me.

I look at coin itself and the actual code. I look at maintenance. I don't really care if someone lost some money on a coin. That's not what gives it value.

Among alts, I have found only a few that are in this class. Some are better, yes, but VIA should be a top 30 market cap at least, going purely by features and development.

A shitcoin doesn't work as a coin. A shitcoin isn't even the same as a coin that has nothing to offer.

From everything I've found about this coin, it is in neither of the above categories. I know that investors are important, but I also know that it's the coin that makes the value.

He posted it in his tweeter: https://twitter.com/btcdrak May 28th...

What you have found about this coin is the answer to some of your personal preferences. Truth is that it doesn't have a single thing that is not wide available in dozens of other projects with much betyter development, trajectory and future.

But hey, it's your money; you get to decide to which crypto-clown you give it.

You don't give money to the developers when you buy it on an exchange. I think you are confused about this issue. These ICOs are long over.

Here's the twitter post you refer to: https://twitter.com/btcdrak/status/604047740322979840

I'm not so sure an armchair commentator should attempt to interpret that dispute. What is your opinion on the technical issue they were arguing about? Why is Gavin correct, in your own words...

I don't see any dispute... no one with eyes and very basic common sense would see one in that exchange. I see an undisputed authority in crypto, the most relevant and (arguably) knowledgeable individual in crypto, dismissing AND despising an "annoying troll" in the form of a self-declared "crypto entrepreneur" with a history of absolute failure in his ONLY enterprise in crypto.

With that in mind, and considering the FACT that no one uses VIA for anything and very few people has even heard of VIA at all, even inside of crypto, after all this time, any "armchair commentator" can make a very educated commentary about the dispute AND the dubious merits of a coin that serves no purpose whatsoever.

ROFL ...ROFL, barabbas the paid fudder is now bashing viacoin

No coin make sense only the barabbas - IconicExpert coins. Oh wait, barabbas thinks that the Paycoin scam is an excellent idea.

ROFL ...ROFL you pathetic barabbas. The Paycoin and Iconexpert scams were good enough for barabbas, btcdrak and viacoin is not