Quote from: BitcoinNational on July 25, 2015, 08:15:28 AM

CANN philosophy
_{focused on getting high quality mmj to patients for the best possible price and CannabisCoin exists to facilitate that, not the other way around}
Or nice way of saying lacks transparency. Seems to be a bit of a debate ATM.

Quote from: B4zz4 on July 23, 2015, 11:27:29 PM

Quote from: tokeweed on July 23, 2015, 12:55:07 PM

I'm very sorry if my posts came across as being impatient. But my point is being honest and transparent to your supporters is a better way to go. It makes us feel we're included.

Also... Yeah, you're right. I have no idea who exactly the people behind CannabisCoin are and their credentials. Sorry for posting that in that context. Didn't mean it that way, and didn't mean any harm.

In the OP it mentioned that the CannabisCoin team is comprised of

Quote

DeltaNine -Core
Peter Bushnell -Core
Esotericizm -Core
Heisenberg -Core
B4zz4 -Core
PCMerc 'Pool Guy' -Contrib
loljosh -Contrib
The Wizard -Contrib
Tulsene -Contrib

I would sure like to know the team better. It would be nice to have a short bio of each in the OP or at cannabiscoin.net. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one interested.

Thanks.

tokeweed, you are perhaps seriously disadvantaged because you have not followed along over the past 15 months or so and 500 pages over two forum threads is too much background reading.

Long-time followers know that I'm an Aussie in Queensland, which may help you understand the possibly strange hours of my posting responses on here.

Whether it's the case or not you appear to be very crypto-focused, wanting to promote the coin and push the value, hurry, hurry, hurry - which is fine for coin speculators but of no particular interest here. DeltaNine and the team are instead focused on getting high quality mmj to patients for the best possible price and CannabisCoin exists to facilitate that, not the other way around. One reason information is only released ex post facto is to minimize the possibility of coin "pumping".

CANN will likely appreciate significantly in value once regular medicine releases are made into the CANNdy inventory. Until that time it is up to individual dispensaries whether they choose to contribute product into that inventory and honor the peg. In due course it is quite possible that printable pamphlet images will be released so that supporters and patients may approach dispensaries with the Yes We CANN model and see if they wish to join too. I have no idea how far that has progressed through review and/or legal assessment and it is a small side project that could be failed-out for any number of reasons.

I can not and will not speak for the rest of the team but I will not be posting a bio or advertizing myself in any way from the land of "if there isn't a law against that there soon will be". Online is the realm of the nom de plume (or should that be "nom de guerre"?) and I strongly doubt that your parents named you "tokeweed". What difference does it make? CANNdy clones will be distributed or they will not. CANNdy will be donated into inventory or it will not. CannabisCoin will prosper or it will not depending on the availability of CANNdy over the next few years.

Nah man. I think they just want to keep things private for now in order to avoid hyping the project. Also, this is crypto, we are in a legal gray area. That plus Cannabis, though it's becoming legal in the US, the CannabisCoin model, though awesome, is also vulnerable to the Feds' prying if noticed. Let's just say, let's keep the noise low for now.

It's normal to get curious and ask questions, especially because of the lack of transparency, but I'm confident D9 and the CannabisCoin team are working hard and hopefully follow through.