Quote from: Beliathon on July 26, 2015, 04:07:36 AM

EDIT:

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on July 26, 2015, 03:52:02 AM

"Why are you so obsessed with being right, and trying to get people to stop believing in God?"

You are obsessed with being right and trying to prove what you believe in is right, and everyone else is wrong, in the same way they are obsessed with converting people.

I consider the liberation of your mind from the lies of superstition to be among my ethical duties as a person possessing exceptional intellectual acuity who is also a compassionate citizen of this hivemind we call the internet.

First, let me acknowledge that I'm a narcissist. But, hey, at least I acknowledge it.

Second, that being said, what does your "intellectual acuity" suggest to you when you -- intentionally or unintentionally, I do not know -- fail to respond to the instances in which your core arguments against Intelligent Design have been proven totally false beyond all possible doubt?

Examples:

1) You close your case (i.e. "case closed") against a belief in God based upon the premise of a total a lack of empirical evidence, though it has been both proven and referenced to you that this is a completely invalid and irrelevant argument. We can toss that argument of yours in the trash.

2) There is no #2. Number 1 is all you've proposed, and it's false. You've demonstrated no other argument.

Here is your debating style in a nutshell:

You: There is no evidence for God or unicorns or flying spaghetti monsters.

Correct person: False analogy, and it's also irrelevant in that, axiomatically, physical evidence can neither prove nor disprove the existence of something with a non-physical component(s).

You: Blah blah blah, superstition.

Correct person: But, you didn't even rebut the point. You just kept going.

You: I am so smart.

Correct Person: Roll Eyes

...And repeat. Sound about right?

Wow. Some acuity. You're essentially a character foil to BADecker. It seems no amount of sound reason will convince either of you to admit you're wrong. I readily await the ad hominems to follow -- unless, you know, you actually want to discuss ideas.