Quote from: cryptodevil on July 27, 2015, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: ilic on July 27, 2015, 11:22:20 AM

. . . if they're not mining like all you ponzi freaks are ~~claiming~~ mathematically proving

There, FITFY.

Let me remind all you scryptards that it was only a short number of months ago that 'Admin' came back from the dead (serious hospitalisation followed by world tour buying secret Scrypt ASICs from secret Scrypt ASIC manufacturers(!)).

Scrypt.cc had *not* been operational at the levels seen after Lazarus, I mean 'Admin' came back from the dead and resurrected his Ponzi scheme. Prior to that most of the first 12 months of this operation exist in the the first 36 pages of this thread until, miraculously:

Thankfully I've been out of the hospital and doing great, I did not make my "comeback" sooner as I have been very busy travelling to other countries and buying hardware directly from the manafactures and overhauling our whole mining infra-structure.
Hope this answers some of your questions,
Take care.

To answer your question, ilic, take a look at the amount of coin mixing services being promoted by scryptards. First rule of cryptocurrency Ponzi, make sure everybody can see the 'massive' amounts of money some people appear to be moving into and out of the 'investment', you know, so they can 'rest assured' that it must be not only totally legit if some 'whales' are shifting such profit out of it, but also hugely profitable as long as the smaller 'investor' gets in quick and re-invests, re-invests, re-invests.

[/quote]

You didnt address my points....

If Scrypt.cc is a ponzi, then for the ponzi to continue there needs to be more people depositing BTC than there are people withdrawing. Correct?

What I am saying is that at any given time, there were approx 30-100BTC being pulled out daily. So, in order for the 'ponzi' to continue, there would need to be the same or more being deposited every day? You still with me here?

I find it highly doubtful that given the large amount of daily withdrawals, there were enough daily deposits to cover this.

I find it more likely, that scrypt.cc are in fact mining and although 850ghash has been proven to be not true, there is no reason why they could not be mining with say 100 or 200 or 300ghash correct?

Maybe, like thousands of businesses before them in both the real world and the world of crypto, they fudged the numbers a bit to sell more khashes that what they actually owned?

It wouldnt be the first time and it wont be the last time that someone tries to sell something they don't really have.

As I do not believe this is a ponzi, I am not going to waste my time looking through blockchain records to find out if the amount of withdraws exceeded the amount of deposits.

U get?