Quote from: cryptodevil on July 28, 2015, 02:18:43 PM

Quote from: ilic on July 28, 2015, 12:40:51 PM

All the ponzi talk is based on 850.

No, the numbers proving they are lying work for just the 500GH they claim to have sold to users too or, if you really want to throw around arbitrary absurdities like, "Well even if they are lying they could be mining with half that", which is utter bullshit an assertion as far as reasoning goes, the same proof still stands for claims they are mining with 250GH/s Scrypt, too.

Don't forget there is only ever 20-60 GH/s of 'unknown' Scrypt miners for the whole LTC network and there is only a total in the Scrypt Altcoin networks for another 60GH or so.

But, for you to even want to lay claim to, "Fine, then, maybe they are lying but they could be mining with half of the half I previously speculated about", you would need to take those two Scrypt GH amounts, add them together and the total you reach of <>120GH, whilst closer to the wildly speculative absurd claim you made, would still require that NOBODY ELSE OTHER THAN SCRYPT.CC is mining any of the Scrypt altcoins or in that 20-60GH/s of 'unknown' on LTC.

Really, you are just scrabbling for your god-of-the-gaps here, but there isn't anything like the sized gap available your beloved 'Admin' needs to function.

If actual mining was taking place, it would be a trivial task for Marcelo to show network hash rates, block stats, etc. Maybe even publish a maintenance fee in USD. Not to beat a dead horse, but look at Hashnest. You really don't have to spend 40 pages in a thread debating whether mining is taking place, because they clearly own miners, find blocks, publish pool stats, publish maintenance fees in USD, and all mined BTC is verifiable on the blockchain. Just because it's LTC/Scrypt and not BTC doesn't make any of what I said less applicable because blockchains are blockchains.