Quote from: fox19891989 on July 31, 2015, 06:55:11 PM

Quote from: dadice on July 31, 2015, 05:11:35 PM

Quote from: ndnhc on July 28, 2015, 05:54:49 PM

@QS, what exactly is your definition of a scam?

It doesn't currently go: "All sort of things and matters, that Quickseller deems a scam".
May be update your trust feedback that it is only your humble and possibly incorrect opinion?

Quote

This is an official account of the scam site DaDice

See this thread for more details --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1066980.0

Please be kind enough to point out who has been scammed by Da Dice?

Don't mind ndnhc, both shorena and quickseller are now promoting a white label "Casino" with no proof to be provably fair (no RNG Certificate) and with no cold wallet address that is covering the jackpot of 3,800+ btc. That is how credible they really are Grin

Funny isn't it Huh

What a pity, they promoted your site very actively but now are both claiming dadice is scam, I can't understand why, I think you paid them the best rate, but they don't know to be grateful. And you haven't scammed anyone so far, how can they claim you are scam.

So you think that as long as a site pays people who would potentially call them out as being a scam, such people should not call them out? I can't speak for shorena, however I can say that my trust is not for sale. DaDice was paying for a service (advertisements), and they got it from both myself and shorena. I stopped providing my services when I got a better offer (although I also would have stopped when I discovered they were a scam), and shorena stopped providing his services when it turned out that DaDice was a scam site.

Quote from: panjul07 on July 31, 2015, 06:57:16 PM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on May 31, 2015, 06:21:38 PM

Quote from: sguegliam on May 31, 2015, 06:11:05 PM

Sorry but i don't have understand, the problem of webmasters don't add a prove to cold wallet is only for investor or also for players?

Both of them are in risk because if a site could not provide a solvency proof then there is a chance that the site might turn out to be a scam site. That is why most gambling site provide their cold address to prove solvency, so that people could play there without worrying about their withdrawal not getting through

Does it mean that the sites who provide the cold address has no chance to be a scam site in the future?
I'd say that providing cold address to prove solvency is not a guarantee, because there is always a chance for them to choose not to pay out.
Not mention to defend Dadice, but I'm saying in general.

No, but not providing a cold storage address means that there is no proof that such site is not running a ponzi and/or is actually able to payout the bets that they are accepting. Not showing a cold storage address means that no one has any reason to believe that DaDice has as large of a bankroll as they claim, as there is zero evidence that they do.