Quote from: shitaifan2013 on July 29, 2015, 06:20:13 AM

Quote from: cazkooo on July 29, 2015, 05:53:25 AM

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on July 29, 2015, 05:25:25 AM

Quote from: dooglus on July 29, 2015, 03:45:22 AM

Quote from: 4Grinz.com on July 24, 2015, 02:23:00 AM

Provably Fair is not a system that can be applied in a slot scenario. Anyone that makes such a claim is not only misguided, but misinformed.

Here are five different sites, not only making such a claim, but actually running provably fair slot games. So who is misguided and misinformed here?

I already sent them an example (bitbandit.eu) one or two days ago, but it appears they're just going to ignore everything and everyone that makes sense from here on now.

time for the neg rep Wink

If this is so then is it time to neg rep everyone here that dont have provably fair? bitcasino.io dont have it either as long as the other site. Also I read some issue here about cold storage, there are many others that claim to give alot of jackpot, then is it time to neg rep them as well? Perhaps dooglus need to do some proof of dooglus provably fair certificate Tongue

if you wouldn't just spam crap for your signature campaign, you would have realized that the difference in this case is, that they're claiming to be provably fair, while they're not.

If you would take 1 minute to look at the bitcasino.io thread than you would have realized that they claimed to be provably fair as well but then after caught lying they said it is a mistake, wash their hands and move on. If this one is going to get neg rep then bitcasino.io should too for not being honest

Quote from: dooglus on July 27, 2015, 03:43:05 PM

Quote from: bitcasino.io on July 27, 2015, 01:46:31 PM

joksim299, fortunately this page was visited just about 40 times for 2015 year, so compering with total amount of 2.5m visits of bitcasino.io during this year, that had no influence on our players. But thanks for the feedback, our seo managers received a good message.

As you said yourself, that page was for SEO purposes, not for players to read.

What that means is that the page's purpose was so that when people did a Google search for "provably fair casino" they would end up at your casino even though it is not provably fair.

Doesn't that seem like a deceptive practice? You have been caught lying about the provable fairness of your games and when challenged about it your defence boils down to "oh, we weren't lying directly to players, we were lying to the search engines so they could lie to players for us; that's better, right guys?"