Quote from: pekatete on August 04, 2015, 11:56:57 AM

Quote from: kano on August 04, 2015, 11:32:00 AM

...
Thus his official terms of service on his web site are wrong ... or you are wrong.
Maybe slush should keep it up to date ... if he has time to and can afford to?
I've no idea which, but I obviously have no want or desire to have an account on slush or follow crap on facedesk.
Since his official terms of service say he is charging you 2% ...
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/terms-of-service
then who knows ...

If you are correct and slush is wrong, then I'd be more worried about the fact that he effectively has no income supporting his pool according to your statement ... and we are heading for another BAN ... if he is forever charging no fees to anyone ever again.
Though of course your 0% fees since 1-Aug you are talking about, is less than 4 days of mining since however long way back when he finally dropped his fees to 2% ... and finishes when? Tongue

We digress, but yes, I am right and the info on the TOS is outdated, but more pertinent, you are wrong (as indeed anyone can be).
If you insist on sticking your head in the sand (even give the impression of doing so), thats your prerogative. Fact is, even before the demise of the fee on slush, actual payouts were better than kano.is expected (and actual) payouts.

Well again I've no idea who is right - since - again - his official terms of service that the pool publishes don't match what you say.
Maybe he's only doing it for a week, so he doesn't go broke paying out many hundreds or thousands of dollars a month running the pool servers, and thus your point is basically irrelevant?

As for payout history ... you don't need to have me prove kano.is is better than slush - look at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1059040.msg11941177#msg11941177
and since his last report, payouts here have continued like that.
So yeah since kano.is has been the best paying pool against BTCGuild, Antpool, F2Pool and NiceHash for payouts over those 12 weeks and payouts have not fallen even with a 666.666% block in there ... I'd have difficulty believing slush was paying better for the past 3 or 4 months ... especially when you provide no proof of that ... and it was reported when we got the 666.666% block, that slush had a worse than 666.666% block in there also ...

Quote from: pekatete on August 04, 2015, 11:56:57 AM

Now that the fees on slush have been dropped AND merged mining NMC introduced, I am as sure as can be that payouts at slush will confortably exceed whatever kano.is can expect to payout, even with the supposed better luck that you claim for kano.is;

Your concerns as to how slush gets on without income are purely for anecdotal value as being the pioneer pool, I am confident they can get their numbers right.

You need to look up the meaning of the word anecdotal.

The numbers, according to you, are zero. So yeah I doubt they can get their numbers right if you are correct in saying their income is zero forever more.