Quote from: Snail2 on August 11, 2015, 10:45:12 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on August 11, 2015, 10:06:08 AM

Quote from: john-connor on August 11, 2015, 06:49:32 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on August 11, 2015, 05:51:22 AM

I'll readily admit I am wrong if John Conner is able to show some details and convincing proof against Sybil attacks on the global lock consensus.

It's your duty to prove it not mine.

Actually both of you are wrong on this.
If TPTB_need_war thinks that there is a bug, he should be able to demonstrate that. If john-connor believes that's not true, he should give a detailed technical explanation about why TPTB_need_war is wrong. ...and so on.

These "There's a bug you scammer!" "No, I don't think so. Mkay?" style discussions doesn't make too much sense.

It is not a bug. It is complete lack of Byzantine fault tolerance. A bug is an implementation error. This is a holistic design error. There is no design. Virtual synchrony is his claimed method. Virtual synchrony does not provide Byzantine fault tolerance.

What more is there for me prove? You are asking me to prove a dog isn't a cat. Isn't it obvious a dog is not a cat.