It a brave new world in crypto when a developer can post a white paper, and open source code, a attest net that no one can attack and still they apparently need to defend themselves......guess what they don't...don't like the coin don't buy it.
Sucks doesn't it when you can't peddle shitcoins any more.
I better not continue posting in the altcoin forums, because then n00bs might actually start investing in the few innovative coins that
actually prove their claims beyond any reasonable doubt.
You still don't seem to understand that perhaps the people capable of attacking it won't do it until there is enough value to extract out of attacking it. I already explained several times that $2100 in VNL is not a bounty because after one successfully attacks it, the VNL will very likely decline in value before the person gets paid the bounty and can convert it to
BTC. And it is not high enough any way. It will require some resources, time, and skills to work out and launch such an attack. Personally I am not interested.
Also I read today that John has been caught turning the mining off and on, thus the test net is not a unprotected P2P network where the adversary can apply all his potential powers.
All we asked was for him to explain how he would handle Sybil and DoS attacks and then you call us trolls for wanting to have a complete white paper and not Swiss cheese. Perhaps he can solve those issues or he can explain why he believes they are non-issues. Or perhaps he doesn't want to at this time to hide them from his competitors. But again, I don't see solutions to those issues. So I remain unconvinced.
It wasn't personal until you called me a troll.
Real scholars and devs
appreciaterequire peer review.