Quote from: RoadTrain on August 18, 2015, 08:14:15 PM

Quote from: turvarya on August 18, 2015, 07:55:55 PM

Quote from: meono on August 18, 2015, 07:48:04 PM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on August 18, 2015, 07:33:53 PM

Quote from: RoadTrain on August 18, 2015, 07:31:21 PM

I don't know how that site counts XT blocks, but if it's simply version > 3, then this recent block by Slush could've triggered it.
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d

Though, it's apparently not XT, just a strange version number.

So it's not an XT block, it's just another bitcointalk.org 'Gavin-ista' trying his best to spread a bit of FUD on the forum?

Why do ppl here always take some post as fact without even checking it first?

This is why the FUD against BitcoinXT went out of control here.

I don't really understand this.
Is 536870919 the version number for BIP101. If not, what would be the right version number?

I believe the version number for BIP101 is 4. But if that site only checks if it's higher than 3, then 536870919 fits as well, though not being an XT block. That's a theory, though.

It actually is , which is the hex number 0x20000007 decimal form. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0101.mediawiki#Deployment for how the deployment plan is to work.