Quote from: BitProdigy on August 22, 2015, 08:31:19 AM

Quote from: Krona Rev on August 22, 2015, 08:00:02 AM

Actually, you never challenged my argument. You changed one of the axioms and then challenged that modified axiom. Again, this is probably obvious to everyone, so there's no need to elaborate.

My good sir, you want me to have created a straw man argument very badly but it is just not the case. This is probably obvious to everyone, but it is obviously not obvious to you, so I will elaborate:

I changed one of the axioms of your argument and then said, "if the axiom were this, then I would agree, but since your axiom was not this, I do not agree."

Your rebuttal is, "You changed one of my axioms, and challenged that modified axiom."

My response is, "No good sir, I changed one of your axioms and agreed with that modified axiom. I did not challenge the modified axiom, I agreed with it. I then challenged your axioms directly." (which you have failed to acknowledge in any way, let alone attempt to rebut)

Your modified version of my axiom was: "Bitcoin XT does not allow running behind Tor."

You are now saying (bold above) you "agree" with this axiom. (I think you mean you believe the axiom is true, since I never introduced the statement or suggested it was true.) However, it's also clear from your previous posts that you clearly don't believe "Bitcoin XT does not allow running behind Tor." Is it possible you're confused about what you're really trying to say?