Quote from: Peter R on August 22, 2015, 07:20:25 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 22, 2015, 07:08:56 PM

Quote from: Peter R on August 22, 2015, 07:01:24 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 22, 2015, 06:20:39 PM

Quote from: LaudaM on August 22, 2015, 06:08:08 PM

Quote from: Peter R on August 22, 2015, 02:45:29 PM

Here are a few names of people opposed to the block size increase along with evidence that they feel the censorship is a positive thing in terms of balancing the debate.
5. LaudaM (link)
-snip-

I'm not even sure what to comment on this. That link does not prove either assumption that you've made. You're spreading false information regarding me (I will not comment the others). I was actually advocating for the increase a few months back in a huge thread (that was over 100 pages long). I never said that the block size limit should not be increased. While I do support a increase (which is not urgent as some think), I do not support XT at all. There is a difference.

As for the "censorship", there are two possible situations: a) either you are not able to comprehend what real censorship is; b) or you have forgotten that this is a privately owned forum.
IMHO this is off-topic.

1 down, 4 to go. Peter?

My apologies LaudaM. I have always appreciated your commentary. Carlton asked for examples of people who appeared to be in favour of the ~~censoring~~ removing off-topic content and threads that are broad in scope and I recalled your recent comment in favour of the action the Forum Administration took by locking Cypherdoc's thread.

I patently did not ask for such a list. Peter, why aren't you paying attention to your own argument? It comes across as a little inconsistent when you "resume" an argument that you were not making previously, on the basis of things that people did not say.

Here are your exact words:

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 22, 2015, 01:01:55 PM

Quote from: Peter R on August 22, 2015, 01:48:21 AM

However, my impression is that most of the 1MB-supporters think the censoring serves as a counterbalance to the higher level of public support BitcoinXT appears to receive.

Who? Name one 1 MB supporter on this forum, Peter.

I am sorry if I mis-interpretted your question, Carlton. When you asked "who?" I thought you were asking me to list some people. As for the remainder of your comment, a don't think I can parse what you are trying to say.

In the mean time, you've still avoided my original question. Let me ask it a different way:

Q: When we look back on this a year from now, will people agree that the discussion of BitcoinXT was off-topic? Will they agree that the locking of Cypherdoc's thread by the Administration "because threads with a broad scope are no longer permitted" was an objective decision?

Peter, you're being evasive and manipulative, I have told you once already about my attitudes to the censorship, yet you keep repeating that I am avoiding your questions. Sadly, the evidence is all here for anyone who wishes to look. I am disappointed that you have revealed yourself to be quite so sociopathic, but rather sooner than later I suppose. Don't address me again, I will not reply.