Quote from: username18333 on August 23, 2015, 05:28:03 AM

Quote from: VirosaGITS on August 23, 2015, 05:17:32 AM

Haha. A USian. Interesting. Well its not like i don't understand the need at some point to go around civil liberties to get information needed to hunt down dangerous criminals. However allowing this in a decentralized network would quite simply expediently destroy it.

Your second point demonstrates that you "don't understand the need at some point to go around civil liberties" (VirosaGITS).

Quote from: username18333 on June 05, 2015, 09:48:26 PM

Quote from: Dale Wilkerson, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Nietzsches philosophy contemplates the meaning of values and their significance to human existence. Given that no absolute values exist, in Nietzsches worldview, the evolution of values on earth must be measured by some other means. How then shall they be understood? The existence of a value presupposes a value-positing perspective, and values are created by human beings (and perhaps other value-positing agents) as aids for survival and growth. Because values are important for the well being of the human animal, because belief in them is essential to our existence, we oftentimes prefer to forget that values are our own creations and to live through them as if they were absolute. For these reasons, social institutions enforcing adherence to inherited values are permitted to create self-serving economies of power, so long as individuals living through them are thereby made more secure and their possibilities for life enhanced. Nevertheless, from time to time the values we inherit are deemed no longer suitable and the continued enforcement of them no longer stands in the service of life. To maintain allegiance to such values, even when they no longer seem practicable, turns what once served the advantage to individuals to a disadvantage, and what was once the prudent deployment of values into a life denying abuse of power. When this happens the human being must reactivate its creative, value-positing capacities and construct new values.

(Colorization mine.)

Can you stop copy pasting tons of stuff and formulate your point or opinion if you have one? You're not understanding what i'm saying. And its pretty simple. Giving central authority over a decentralized body make it not decentralized anymore. That would effectively kill what Bitcoin is.

Was that in an acceptable form to be understood?