Quote from: kjj on September 26, 2012, 06:58:23 PM

Consideration isn't a synonym for gain or profit. It requires an exchange, a trade. The commission paid isn't paid for the promise, it is incidental to it. It may have happened because of the promise, but not in consideration of it.

I fail to see this distinction you make.

Quote from: LoupGaroux on September 26, 2012, 08:16:14 PM

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on September 26, 2012, 03:26:38 PM

lalala... a bunch of other stuff from a bunch of other people...

So you are here in this thread as a GLBSE owners speaking for GLBSE. I now understand your personal attacks in the other threads. Roll Eyes

So you told Nefario in secret but nefario still said they were worht money and let them trade Roll Eyes

Why did you not bother to tell us before now? Why let people buy them at over 10 BTC each? Are you part of the fraud?

Should you also be listed as a scammer? Did you list the fake GLBSE shares?

"fake" GLBSE was tradeable in GLBSE 2. That is a fact. Not only was it moved to GLBSE 2 but it was tradeable. That is a fact.

You have called me a scammer many times all over the forum. Yet the only thing you posted in the "Goat is a scammer thread" was personal insults. As a GLBSE owner I hope you can back up your claim and post what you have in that thread. I look forward to your apology if you do not post evidence.

Sadly I was one of the few honest asset issuers on GLBSE 1 and 2.

I did not know who all the owners where but had I know one of them was you I would have never taken part. You and nefario... I got in cuz I trusted Theymos and now he is wanting to leave... Smart man...

No. Categorically no. I am not now, nor have I ever been a GLBSE Actual owner. And when theymos' shares come on the market I have no plans at this time to become an owner, or shareholder in GLBSE Actual. I have no standing whatsoever to speak for GLBSE in any capacity. I was responding to facts of the timeline as I know them from personal experience, and trying to address your mis-characterization of those responses to someone else's question in furtherance of your own agenda.

No. Categorically no. I did not "tell" Nefario anything at all. I had a discussion in regards to the fake asset. A discussion that is not germane to your rant, nor are you welcome to make assumptions about it in support of your agenda.

What exactly am I "telling" you and the cast of imaginary thousands you refer to as "us"? I responded to a courteous question with a courteous answer. You decided to spin it off into something that it wasn't. I have no obligation, legal or otherwise to make sure that you understand the concept of due diligence. You have held yourself out as a competent businessman and offered your services as manager for other people's funds. One can only hope that you understand the very basic requirements to study those investments before you accept others funds in trust to invest in them, although I fear as your history with the pirate situation has shown, you don't. So, sorry, but is not my job to tell you squat about anything. Do your own damn homework, before you go off playing in the grown up world.

As to standards of evidence- go fuck yourself with a barbed wire condom. You are not in a court of law, yet, and until you are I have no obligation to present anything to you anywhere about any topic. You are a lowlife, a scammer, a criminal and wanna-be white slaver. You are the lowest form of contemptible trash is this community, and I have no obligation to produce anything to prove that to you- the whole world can see it from your incessant words.

No. Categorically no. I never listed any asset at all on GLBSE. I briefly considered a couple of concepts, but watching amateurs like you and Peter pretty much convinced me that GLBSE is a playground for the desperate and intellectually challenged. Not a place I want to put much effort at all. Since there was no asset ever listed, your ridiculous comment that I am a scammer is utterly hollow.

GLBSE Fake was never tradeable on version 2.0 of the market. It was imported as a locked asset. Otherwise you could have just listed them and shilled for yourself as you did for pirate. They were not tradeable so you had to make another of your boring threads seeking to trade them through a direct transfer, while seeking an obscene profit level for your poorly thought out investment.

Unless your feet have become blocks of ice, Hell hasn't frozen over yet, so you can keep waiting for your apology. It will be forthcoming on the twelfth of never. Until then, fall back on fucking yourself you miserable cheat.

The only sad thing about GLBSE and Goat is that you ever discovered it, and somehow managed to slip through the review and list assets. That their legal counsel had advised shutting you and your scams down is a strong testimonial for the integrity they are seeking to build around the brand. Oops, too bad for you little scammer boy.

And again, just in case you remain too dim witted to understand- I never was, never have been nor will ever be an owner in any capacity of GLBSE Actual. If the few shares of GLBSE Fake that I bought on the market during 1.0 and sold on that market during the short window that they could be sold, were in fact sold to you- then I laugh my ass off at your stupidity in investing in something that was clearly and publicly proclaimed to have no value.

And you would probably be well served to not second guess theymos' motivation in offering some of his shares- you will probably be as wrong on this subject as you are on most all others.

Whoa. Wait just a minute there. You did what?