Quote from: Audriux9 on September 27, 2012, 01:44:18 AM

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on September 26, 2012, 07:39:14 PM

Quote from: Akka on September 26, 2012, 07:30:50 PM

I still wouldn't call him a scammer as at least his intentions seem right.

It is pointless to judge intentions. Just facts matters. And the facts are that a breach of the contract already happened.

You are right, contract has been already breached and such a behavior from mining security owner is not only dishonorable but also has its consequences and liabilities for investors.

However, how do you think putting a scammer tag on moparguy528 would help to reimburse investors money? Would it help at all to reach optimal solution on liquidating FPGAMINING?

Giving him a scammer tag would warn potential investors not to buy any more shares.