Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience

The problem here is that Dadice hadn't mentioned that rule at first (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996260.msg11994350#msg11994350), but suddenly came up with it last week when it had extended downtime (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg12183171#msg12183171).

It is always a bad idea to change the rules of an on-going campaign, as it will for sure cause confusion and controversy.

My point exactly.

I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their "modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much

Maybe the user who won with their modified timeframe was one of their shills. This is obviously speculation however it would match up with their other highly unethical and sketchy behavior

¸

I wouldn't go as far as that; it is just 0,1 btc. But i agree it is unethical to change terms mid game, with the dev making an error and not user. (referring to downtime)