Quote from: jonald_fyookball on August 26, 2015, 06:09:59 PM

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on August 26, 2015, 06:02:49 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on August 26, 2015, 05:53:58 PM

Quote from: brg444 on August 26, 2015, 05:48:06 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on August 26, 2015, 05:46:29 PM

OP, all I see from your graphic is Bitfury supports Bip 100.

But whatever, as long as we get bigger blocks and Blockstream
is cockblocked from keeping the 1mb in place, I'll be happy.

Don't really give a rat's ass one way or the other about XT.

Blockstream, or its developers, never argued for permanent 1mb. I thought I taught you to shut your mouth when you were ignorant of facts?

Did you not read my post on your thread clearly highlighting the benefits of larger blocks for sidechains?

They stonewalled the increase for years (and continue to do) , same thing.
They want the 1mb to be in place for their lightening payment network.

For years? Shocked

Oh, not you Jonald! Sad

You do know sidechains are better with bigger block size limit, right? I don't know what else to say to you! Frankly, really disappointed!

* Edited.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-block-size-debate-going-since-2013/

You were saying Core developers, who are also Blockstream developers, were stonewalling 1 MB limit for years and are continuing to do so. Which is a FUD/disinformation and is very different from "block size limit debate has been going on for years"! You support XT and assumes core developers are against raising block size limit especially because of Blockstream. Its okay but you are spreading your assumption and/or speculations as a "fact" everywhere. Propaganda? I don't know! You used to be a neutral diplomat and an accurate judge but its fading away!