Usagi piggipacked his absurd demands on a buy back of BMF shares and now is accusing of a scam. He is mad at me because I and many others are not happy what is happening in BMF and in other portfolios under his management.
This seems like a valid concern. Could you elaborate on why you feel like usagi should have bought back your BMF shares above market value? Also, what value per share, exactly, do you think you deserved to be offered if these "absurd demands" weren't included?
I actually never asked him
to sell me the shares back. He made that offer to me, after I told him I am not happy with the current situation and he sold me the shares under the false representation of current situation in BMF.
Usagi did not offer to sell any BMF shares back to EskimoBob, but to buy the shares back from EskimoBob. This is a false statement.
If you read the log, I never really agreed to any of his rantings freely. He never mentioned, that his yelling of STFU, mixed with insults is some type of a contract. All I wanted now (because he made a unexpected offer) is get out of this crap called BMF and get my coin back.
Get out of what? Is EskimoBob not already out? Usagi already bought back all EskimoBob BMF shares. EskimoBob once again is making a contradictory statement. EskimoBob agreed several times with Usagi terms to sell back the BMF shares:
[21:53:54] yes, you can have that shit, you ling sack of shit
[21:56:17] you can have your shit. Good you remembered
[21:57:35] yes
[22:01:46] do I need to repeat that Yes?
[22:02:40] wht, 2 x Yes in not good enough?
[22:07:39] usagi: HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU NEED ME TO TELL YOU "YES"?
[22:07:42] YES
When he started counting seconds, I asked, "do I need to repeat that Yes?". I had lost all the trust I in this scumbag and a liar, who has obvious memory problems (selective memory?). I wanted to sell my shares back to him and that is what my Yes stands for - Yes, I am transferring you the shares. Nothing less, nothing more.
I do not see contract here. I see just another rant of his, where he calls me with names and adds his "shut the fuck up..." or else.
I do not sell my silence, my support to some bullshit, I do not write my opinions about incompetent "portfolio managers" for coin and so on.
Usagi did not ask EskimoBob to support his business. Usagi explicitly required EskimoBob to remain neutral about his business. At no moment was EskimoBob required to write anything about Usagi's business. This is a completely redundant statement.
What are people's opinions of this specific statement? I want to hear what people think, regardless of your relation to the case. Yes, even you guys that are silently lurking in this thread.
Maged, you made two important questions to EskimoBob and he was not able to answer either. Instead of EskimoBob providing a coherent answer explaining how much the shares should worth if the "absurd demands" were not included, EskimoBob decided to play the victim and write off misleading statements. EskimoBob sold back to Usagi the shares above the market price under certain conditions and now EskimoBob is afraid to return the difference. Thus, EskimoBob is trying to evade your judgement since you have already indicated that EskimoBob was overpaid by Usagi.