Quote from: Klestin on August 30, 2015, 09:20:15 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 30, 2015, 09:10:54 PM

Do you normally handle disclarity like that? By replying as if you knew exactly what was intended?

I answered one interpretation of the question - the literal one. Like it or not, it is a fact that this distinction is misunderstood by some. I'm happy that you're not one of them, but if you take a moment to review my post history, you'll find more than one instance where my clarification on this issue (block size vs block size cap) has resulted in a 'thank you' from those who had not understood the distinction.

That's terrifying, your grasp of the facts is poor on the issue we are discussing at present.

Quote from: Klestin on August 30, 2015, 09:20:15 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 30, 2015, 09:10:54 PM

Tautology alert.

I think you should read my statement again if you believe it to be a tautology.

Shall I take your lack of reply to my question as a "no, I can't give a rational argument against that"? Or will you give an actual answer?

I read it several times; it contains two propositional statements that are logically identical, and a conditional statement where you suggest that the two propositions depend on one another? That's the literal definition of a tautology, and no, there is no "actual" answer to such nonsense.