Quote from: shitaifan2013 on September 02, 2015, 06:36:13 PM

that is a very weird way under the given circumstances to test tsps trustworthiness Huh

not sure what you're really trying to prove there, doog. but it appears you're trying to teach QS a lesson using tsps "case".

Testing his trust with a small amount of money was QS' idea. I did as he suggested:

Quote from: Quickseller on August 19, 2015, 11:51:57 PM

Knowing that tspacepilot fraudulently withdrew some amount of money from coin chat, and knowing that he lied about it, would you trust him with a small amount of money, say 4BTC? What about an amount similar that was claimed by TF that tspacepilot stole, say 0.5BTC? What about half that amount, say .25BTC? What if there was a way that would guarantee that you are in fact speaking to tspacepilot but had no way to prove your agreement (e.g. only you would know that you got scammed), would you trust him with any of the above amounts?

What do you think would happen if you accidentally sent any of the above amounts to tspacepilot? What about a greater amount? Do you think he would quickly return the money?

Are any of the above answers impacted on the fact that you know that tspacepilot withdrew money from coin chat that he was not entitled to? Does the fact that tspacepilot lied about withdrawing money from coin chat numerous times affect any of the above answers?

I think a lot of people would trust a hero member who they know is the original owner of their account with .25BTC (I don't think tspacepilot has been sold), but I do not think it would be smart to trust tspacepilot with that small of an amount.

tsp has been on the forums for a long time without apparently ripping anyone off. Other than some trumped up charges from QS over an accident years ago involving a bot and some dust I don't see any reason to suspect he's at all scammy.

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on September 02, 2015, 06:36:13 PM

anyway, publicity stunts like this are exactly why everybody should manage his very own trust list

edit: I have neither doog nor QS on my trust list, so tsp appears neutral to me, which is probably the most correct display of his actual trust.

There's no publicity stunt. The loan happened about a week ago, and nobody even mentioned it until QS noticed a screenshot of it linked from my feedback on tsp's profile. If QS is justified in leaving negative feedback about a malfunctioning bot taking some BTC dust against a defunct scam site's terms and conditions that didn't exist at the time when the alleged "crime" happened then surely it's OK for me to leave positive feedback about the fact that I trusted him with 1 BTC worth of value and he didn't attempt to steal it from me. I'm not saying "this guy is great, trust him with your life savings". I'm saying "I loaned him 1 BTC worth of value and he repaid it". That's all.