Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining
by
cryptodevil
on 03/09/2015, 04:51:33 UTC
Hey Kenny/Admin/ThorSWO,

Are you keeping up with the news regarding these criminal ponzi-based 'investment' scams?
http://www.natlawreview.com/article/just-how-scary-sec-fear-not-sufficient-grounds-to-duck-administrative-subpoena
Quote
The SEC’s continuing investigation centers around potential securities law violations that occurred in connection with GAW’s sale of Hashlets and PayCoin, and the possibility that claims to investors about the virtual currency mining operations were false and misleading. The Commission is also investigating whether GAW’s Hashlet sales had the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme and is investigating what happened to the millions of dollars in revenue that GAW earned in bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

I'm getting the impression, what with you and ThorSWO et al. repeatedly posting lame excuses trying to down-play the seriousness of the crime, trying to claim that it is we in this thread who are guilty of wrongdoing against you,  I mean 'Admin', even going so far as to cite differences in GH/s and GHS as some sort of get-out-of-jail-free card, that perhaps you are as scared as Carlos Garza and are desperately hoping that throwing around a ton of bullshit will make everyone else stink and distract from the truth.

The truth being, of course, that scrypt.cc is a proven criminal operation and it will only be a matter of time before the appropriate authorities catch up with you. It does help, of course, that scrypt.cc is dragging this out for weeks on end, hoping that the heat will die down by the time these 'MHS' are worth far less than they would have been able to drop when they were simply 'KHS', in the mistaken hope you can just walk away in time as nobody will be interested anymore. There'll always be someone interested, particularly because many scrypt.cc 'investors' have been US citizens.

So, sure, keep the site running long enough that the three-letter agencies can see for themselves without needing to subpoena hosting providers, would you? That'd be super, thanks.