Quote from: nyktalgia1 on September 03, 2015, 05:55:53 AM

Quote

Whether you played on one IP or on 300, it wouldn't have made a difference to your rolls. Why is that so hard to understand?

(1)Then why did it keep blocking my IP when I was betting on 5 different accounts at the same time? (1.2)How can I be gambling on 20 bots on PRC for over a month until he changed base bet, and I try the same thing on safedice and lose on 2 out of 5 bots in less than 30 minutes? That makes NO SENSE unless they somehow take in to account how many bots I'm using per IP.

(2)I feel like they implemented it this way to counter people like me trying to bet the same time on multiple accounts. Something screwed up I'm telling ya man I'm not stupid, ignorant , or crazy.

(3)Say I lost 50 times in a row, and the next bet was going to be a win if you were betting on one account. But say you were betting on 2 accounts at the same time, the next bet was definately a win, but the 2nd account win at 1 sat base, when it needed a higher bet to recover. So you get the win on account #2, and the next 10 bets are losses that will cause you to bust on account #1. The 2nd account took over the win that should have been a recovery bet for the 1st account.

(4)Why is this impossible to happen? It makes perfect sense to me. I'm not saying my rolls were rigged, I'm saying it won so much on other accounts, that it caused some accounts to hit improbable loss streaks.

(5)It took wins that should have been on the account that needed to recovery, and gave them to an account that didn't need the wins. I know for a fact this is the case, but w/e I don't know how to prove it without dissecting their source code.

(6)You can also look at it this way.... I busted on one account, and got small wins on another accounts that should have been big recovery wins for the account I busted on (wins on other accounts ruined my line for recovery)....... it never should have busted so fast regardless. I've been using 1 bot on safedice for a month now and hasnt even come CLOSE to busting like these did in less thn 30 min prob more like 15 min......... sorry bro but you are missing something.

(1)Because there is a limit to the amount of times a single IP can make API calls. This is a big problem for my chatbot because it means it can't collect all of the bets it needs for drawing the charts and sometimes even misses some chat messages. This has nothing to do with the amount of accounts or your strategy. If you take one account and spam more than 2 bets per second for about 5 seconds, you'll start getting errors.

(1.2)Because you had extremely bad luck.

(2)No, They implemented it this way to reduce the effects of a DDOS attacks.

(3)No. If you lost 50 bets at a 50% chance to win, you have a 50% of winning the next bet. Previous rolls have no influence on the outcome of future rolls. That's not how chance work. You should read up about gamblers fallacies.

(4)That's probably the biggest fallacy I've ever heard, but i hardly understand what you're saying, so i can't really say anything to argue against your point.

(5)This doesn't make sense either. Your rolls are independent of all previous rolls, account, person, site and anything other than chance. And no. If you knew it for a fact, you already had proof. If you don't have proof, it's a theory that you feel very strongly about.

(6)again, the only "should've" in gambling is a "should've" about not gambling. Chance is a funny thing and anything can happen. No matter how many times you've lost in a row on how many different accounts, your next bet has the exact same chance of losing as your first bet. I'm not missing anything. It's as simple as, you had some bad luck that day.

Your arguments are getting more and more nonsensical by the day, so from now on, I'm going to try my best to just leave it to others to argue with you over your fallacies.