Quote from: cryptodevil on September 03, 2015, 06:17:32 AM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 03, 2015, 06:06:25 AM

What new investors?

Every single 'investor' who sent money to scrypt.cc after the very first 'investor' did is a 'new' investor. The crime has already been committed, Kenny, so the continuing existence of the website to this day serves as a handy start point for investigators to work their way backwards from.

Scrypt.cc cannot suddenly make themselves legit, Kenny, money earned from having lied to people in order to get them to 'invest' is known as the 'proceeds of crime'.

As for

Quote from: PoorKenny

That by definition, is not a pozi cuz he did provide a mining source.

Fractional mining isn't an excuse, kiddo, it's a crime. You can't sell more mining power than you actually have, that's fraud.

Goodness, you really are extraordinarily uninformed about these things.

so then you proved my point???

good boy fraud is fraud ponzi is ponzi.

lying to earn a profit is fraud. Paying people with money from your lied about mining is still fraud.

good to see you really don't have a brain this is getting us somewhere.

Try proving this one right in an attempt to denounce it.

Scrypt.cc is not a ponzi. It is a fraudulent investment firm, providing false earning data, when they indeed have less...

How, btw is this shilling, still not clear.

Quote

Scrypt.cc is not a ponzi. It is a fraudulent investment firm, providing false earning data, when they indeed have less...

i posted it twice so you get a second look kay...

edit: also fine details like KHS vs kh/s make the biggest of differences. A jury of laymen see th "/" in there and see it as something else. Probably have been to jury duty, just not for a case that ued that to it's advantage...I don't really recall what it was about i kinda slept some, i do know i didn't know what it was and the guy walked.