Quote from: christophorus on September 03, 2015, 07:28:14 AM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 03, 2015, 07:06:37 AM

I should probably point out to all BTC is worth fuck loads more than LTC.
Suggesting Scrypt is a ponzi would rule out the "Greed" factor for the admin.
Perhaps the PSA on every page should be changed to address the issue that Scrypt.cc is taking all coins as profit.

Any sort of "Profit" generated by any "Mining" is undercut and overwritten, and is there fore not a ponzi. In a ponzi you have the chance to pull out your money.

Scrypt.cc does not permit this. It is not a provable ponzi, and indeed provably fraudulent, and guilty of theft. Scrypt.cc has enormous wait lengths on deposits, where as the should be quick, they may take several hours.

When and, indeed if, a withdrawal occurs, it is processed within 24 hours, plenty of time to do much more than simply pay in someone else's funds.

If the only solution is "Ponzi" this "Ponzi" that, then where have all of the user's "Skip the large deposits" gone?

Shill me again, and negatrust mah butt, but if no one addresses the issues that exist, then i take it upon myself to keep you fools in check.

Is that why the site only accepts BTC? Surely a site that invested in mining LTC, or variants, would accept LTC as payment.

Of couse, when I say invested in mining I mean doesn't have a single fucking miner and it's all bullshit.

No, he took your BTC, gives you shit and runs. The mining he does does not cover all expenses and IS a bunch of bull fucking shit...Up to speed please.

Edit if it was a ponzi, and it can't pay out like it needs to, then it shuts down to not go into the less then desirable zone.

In order to offset it, and "Pay" any kind of shit, he has to have anything coming in, doesn't matter how big/small it is, as a bank keeps only enough for expected withdrawals on hand. So why would any body do a ponzi in the first place? It has a less than desirable profit, and can easily go sour quick. For SCC to remain this long into the game is simply unthinkable with no revenue from any other source...

which leads me to believe your point of embezzlement was more accurate prolly should stick with that, until we can find out.